Does the landlord have to live in a house for it to be classified as a boarding house?

Question Details: ?

Filed under Tenancy | 1229 View(s)

Are you a lawyer? Login or register to answer this question.

Answers by Lawyers

Community Law Wellington & Hutt Valley

No, the landlord does not have to live in a house for it to be classified as a boarding house.

Under the Residential Tenancies Act, a boarding house tenancy is simply an agreement covering one bedroom, in a house with shared facilities for at least six tenants at any one time. The agreement has to be intended to last for at least 28 days. The landlord might or might not live in the house.

For more information on boarding house tenancies, please click here:

Answered 30 Jul 2013. The IMPORTANT NOTICE below is part of this answer.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The answer provided above is intended for general informational purposes only and cannot be considered a substitute for face-to-face legal advice. It should not be relied upon as the sole basis for taking action in relation to a legal issue. Laws change frequently, and small variations in the facts, or a fact not provided in the question, can often change a legal outcome or a lawyer’s conclusion. No liability whatsoever is accepted by the authors or publishers of the answer, for loss, damage or inconvenience arising in any way from the use of this site. While each answer has been published by a lawyer with a practising certificate, that person may not necessarily have experience in the particular area of law involved.

For more information about this website, please review our Terms of Use.