Question Details: ?
Filed under Employment Law | 2269 View(s)
In most cases, the answer will be yes. A restraint of trade clause is not affected by the way in which you have been dismissed, provided that you are justifiably dismissed.
However, there are two exceptions:
1. If the restraint of trade clause itself says that it will not apply if you are dismissed by reason of redundancy, then of course it will not still apply. But I assume the clause in your case does not state that because otherwise you would not have asked the question.
2. If you have been dismissed in a way that was unjustified, then you can argue that the entire employment agreement, including the restraint of trade, has been repudiated. In other words, you are no longer bound by the restraint because the employer did not act in accord with it when dismissing you. The only problem with this approach is that your restraint will typically expire before you can get a ruling that you were unjustifiably dismissed. So there is some risk in treating yourself as not bound by the restraint on this basis, because you may be wrong. For a case that applies this principle see paras 94 and 95 of this determination of the Employment Relations Authority: www.nzlii.org
Answered 12 Oct 2015. The IMPORTANT NOTICE below is part of this answer.
The answer provided above is intended for general informational purposes only and cannot be
considered a substitute for face-to-face legal advice. It should not be relied upon as the sole
basis for taking action in relation to a legal issue. Laws change frequently, and small
variations in the facts, or a fact not provided in the question, can often change a legal
outcome or a lawyer’s conclusion. No liability whatsoever is accepted by the authors or
publishers of the answer, for loss, damage or inconvenience arising in any way from the use of
this site. While each answer has been published by a lawyer with a practising certificate, that
person may not necessarily have experience in the particular area of law involved.